7/13/2023 0 Comments Android studio sqliteUsing cat to read sqlite3 and save it to a new file called sqlite3.exe. I have yet to test it but I was considering using something like: Even with the EXE extension, some files are running properly. I also read somewhere some people are getting success with changing a linux file to linux_file.exe on SD card so that the SD card recognizes it as executable. So that means that if I want to execute the file under the user permission, it needs to be owned by shell app ? I found somewhere that Android has a separate user for every application. However if there are dependencies that i'm missing, I'd love to know about it. So from what I understand the version I got is the CLI version The name of the package escapes me at the moment, but it had a folder with three files Other Android developers are much more likely to have the pertinent knowledge, and on an Android forum they are less likely to regard the issue as off-topic which will also improve your odds of getting a useful answer. My recommendation of a different forum was intended to improve your odds of success and help keep this forum on-topic. I do not hope to disabuse you of your hope(s). While you are likely right that my issue is with my environment and not with SQLite, my hope is that other SQLite enthusiasts may have bumped up against this issue and be able to help with how to solve it. IOW, the 'x' bits do not mean quite what you think they mean. (They do not on Linux, and I'm too lazy to check this on other Unix-like systems.) They do not mean that that, once loaded, program image text segments from the file will be physically executable. I would not expect the per-file permission bits to reflect whether the block device was mounted with the noexec option. The per-file execute permission is separate from the effect of the noexec mount option. It suggests that the 'x' bit is less significant (with respect to today's problem) than you seem to think. I saw the difference between "RWXRWX-" and "rw rw -" (on your "emulated storage") as significant and related to the "noexec" mounting. When you said its a clue that the comment noexec is relevant, How can you say that when the permission says RWXRWX- Doesn't that say that the base user should be able to execute? I just don't think that's a constraint that is going to be flexible during troubleshooting or allow you to do the experiments that would allow you to figure out what the relevant factors are that lead to today's problem. I do not question your motivation for wanting to avoid rooting a phone. If it were just for me, fine, but if I want others to use it who may not be as enthusiastic about rooting, wouldn't it be great if it could work? Import static reason for not wanting to root is that I wanted to develop an application / extension that others could easily use without rooting their phone. Here is an example from a tutorial and an example on GitHub: import One way to implement SQLite testing is with an instrumented unit test, using the InstrumentationRegistry in the Android test package to obtain a Context. SQLiteDatabase db = this.getReadableDatabase() Ĭursor cursor = db.rawQuery("SELECT * FROM " + Table_Name, null) public class DatabaseManager extends SQLiteOpenHelper ) How do I go about this? This is the code for my database. I want to do unit tests for the insertNote, readNote and updateNote methods for the database. I'm new to android app development and I just made a note app.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |